Please update Google Chrome

Premium Tracker needs a newer version of Chrome to display correctly. Update Chrome from the Play Store, then reopen the app.

Update Chrome
Strategy Playbook

Running a Covered Call Without Owning the Shares

A LEAPS call stands in for 100 shares, at a fraction of the capital and with a new risk.

Advanced13 min readUpdated

Worth reading first: Covered Calls and the Upside You Sell, Long-Dated Contracts and What Changes

Course contents73 lessons · 28 questions

A covered call needs 100 shares. On a $400 stock that is $40,000, which puts the strategy out of reach for most accounts on most of the names people actually want to trade.

The poor man's covered call substitutes a deep in-the-money LEAPS call for the shares. It is a diagonal spread, it costs perhaps a quarter as much, and it introduces one risk the real thing does not have.

A long-dated long call with a short-dated call against it

Set the long leg deep in the money and far out in time, then sell a short-dated call above it. This is a diagonal viewed at the short leg's expiration.

$100.00
$105.00

different strike makes it diagonal

30 days
60 days
30%
  • P&L when the short leg expires — the long leg still has life left
Net debit to open-$50
Best case at front expiry+$216around $100
Time left on the long leg30 dayswhat you still own afterwards
Ideal outcomeDrift toward the short strikethe position wants nothing dramatic
The chart prices the long leg for its remaining time at the short expiration. Real LEAPS pricing also carries meaningful rho, which this model includes but which the chart does not isolate.

Why a deep ITM LEAPS stands in for stock

Because of delta. A call struck far below the current price has a delta approaching 1.00 — it gains roughly a dollar for every dollar the stock gains, which is what owning 100 shares does.

Deep ITM LEAPS delta ≈ 0.80 to 0.95 → behaves like 80-95 shares

The closer to 1.00, the more the position behaves like stock.

It is also mostly intrinsic value, which matters: with little extrinsic value there is little to decay away. A deep in-the-money LEAPS is a slow-bleeding, stock-like asset rather than a wasting one.

The capital argument

Covered callPoor man's version
Capital to open$40,000≈$11,500
Delta exposure100 shares≈88 shares
Monthly premium$600$600
Return on capital1.5%5.2%
DividendsReceivedNone
Position expiresNeverIn 18 months

A $400 stock. Covered call against 100 shares, versus a PMCC on a $300-strike LEAPS.

The return-on-capital line is the attraction and, as with credit spreads, it is also the warning. The same premium against a quarter of the capital is leverage, and leverage cuts both ways.

Building one

The long leg. As far out as liquidity allows, usually 9 to 24 months. Deep enough in the money for delta above roughly 0.80. Deeper means more stock-like, more expensive, and less at risk of expiring worthless.

The short leg. Standard covered-call practice: 30 to 45 days, 0.20 to 0.30 delta, above the current price.

The rule that matters. The short strike must be above the long strike, and ideally the total credit you collect over the position's life should exceed the extrinsic value you paid in the long leg. Otherwise you are funding a wasting asset.

Total premium collected > extrinsic value paid on the long leg

The check most people skip, and it is the one that decides whether the structure earns.

Three other differences from the real thing

No dividends. Option holders do not receive them. On a dividend payer this can be a substantial part of the return you are giving up.

Assignment is awkward. If the short call is exercised you must deliver shares you do not own. In practice the broker exercises your long call to cover, which closes the whole structure — often at a worse price than closing it yourself would have.

Rate sensitivity. A LEAPS carries real rho. Falling rates work gently against the long leg, which is one of the few places rho genuinely matters to a retail trader.

Where it fits

A poor man's covered call is a leveraged, time-limited approximation of a covered call. It is a reasonable tool for accessing expensive underlyings with limited capital, and a poor substitute if what you actually wanted was to own the company.

The test: are you doing this because you want the shares and cannot afford them, or because you want the premium and the shares are incidental? The first is a capital constraint worth working around. The second is leverage looking for a justification.

What can go wrong

The long leg expiring. The failure mode shares do not have.

Short strike below the long strike. Creates real uncapped loss in the gap.

Paying too much extrinsic on the long leg. If the premium collected never exceeds it, the structure cannot profit.

Forgetting the dividends. On a payer, a meaningful part of the return simply is not there.

Key takeaways

  1. A poor man's covered call replaces 100 shares with a deep in-the-money LEAPS call, at roughly a quarter of the capital.
  2. It works because a deep ITM call has delta near 1.00 and little extrinsic value to decay.
  3. The return on capital looks far better because the capital is smaller — that is leverage, not free improvement.
  4. The long leg expires. Shares do not. That converts 'wait it out' into 'be right within 18 months'.
  5. Check that the premium you expect to collect exceeds the extrinsic value paid on the long leg, or the structure cannot earn.

Check your understanding

  1. 1. Why does a deep in-the-money LEAPS call substitute for 100 shares?

  2. 2. What risk does a PMCC carry that a real covered call does not?

  3. 3. What check determines whether a PMCC can actually be profitable?

Related lessons

← All coursesTest yourself →